IPv6 Community | Digg

IPB192: IPv6 Lab Update | Packet Pushers

In this episode, Tom incorrectly identifies Debian 13 as the platform he got IPv6-mostly working on when in reality it was CentOS 9 Stream. In his defense, Tom had been fixated all week on how cool he thinks Debian is generally (Debian, sadly, doesn’t feel the same way about him)

@atw

IPv6 is not insecure because it lacks a NAT

I recently saw a discussion where someone argued that IPv4 is more secure than IPv6 because “the NAT-by-default of IPv4 effectively means that I get the benefit of a default-deny security strategy.” This is a common misconception that I think is worth addressing. - John Maguire

@atw

IPv6 Certifications – Hogg Networking

If you're considering a new-year's resolution to learn more about #IPv6, then also consider taking a free IPv6 certification exam to show what you've learned. - @SCOTTHOGG

@atw

IPB191: IPv6 Predictions for 2026 | Packet Pushers

This podcast episode from Packet Pushers discusses predictions for IPv6 adoption in 2026, featuring insights from Ed Horley, Tom Coffeen, and Nick Buraglio.

You’ve reached the end of the feed.

Roll credits.

IPB192: IPv6 Lab Update | Packet Pushers

IPv6 is not insecure because it lacks a NAT

IPv6 Certifications – Hogg Networking

IPB191: IPv6 Predictions for 2026 | Packet Pushers

You’ve reached the end of the feed.

/ipv6

About

Community Guidelines

Founded by

Top Contributors